A Great Big Load Of Nothing

We have plentiful evidence of the harm done by #vaccines. Studies done into the results; #braindamage, #autism (hundreds – if not thousands – of these studies exist showing that vaccines are linked to autism, regardless of the government and media lies otherwise), compromised immune systems, auto-immune diseases, mitochondrial errors, #toxic overload, #epidemics due to viral shedding by the #vaccinated.

But no peer reviewed scientific studies with proper randomised double-blind tests and with control groups of totally #unvaccinated versus #vaccinated that shows vaccines protect anyone.

It’s something which the #provax side can never cite. Something that should be there, but apparently does not exist. It’s so important to the debate that it could be called the most important weapon they could use, yet they don’t have it. The lack of this piece of evidence is astounding all the more so because nearly everyone assumes that this evidence is there already, and yet it doesn’t exist.

All they need to cite is peer reviewed scientific studies with proper double-blind tests and control groups of totally unvaccinated versus vaccinated that shows vaccines protect anyone.

They have none.

To be blunt. There’s no SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that vaccines work at all.

I’m not kidding. Can anyone cite a peer reviewed scientific study with proper randomised double-blind tests and a control group of totally unvaccinated versus vaccinated that shows vaccines protect people? I’ve asked for such evidence for years. The vaccine fanatics can not cite even one (1) peer reviewed scientific study with a proper control group of totally unvaccinated versus vaccinated to show that vaccines protect anyone. They assume that vaccines protect them without much evidence in any peer reviewed scientific studies to support the claims that vaccines even work as advertised. Vaccines are a pharmaceutical product. Not everything alleged to do something actually does as advertised. Not every government agency is the epitome of angelic truth. Doctors usually don’t even look at peer reviewed studies nor ask for evidence to verify what they’re told at symposiums or in medical schools.

The folks who believe that vaccines saved lives, that vaccines eradicated once common diseases are apparently unaware of this. They give credit to vaccines for entirely reducing the risks of disease since the 19th century. (They just ignore sanitation, clean water, soap, nutrition, better housing, etc, etc . . . or that Measles death rates had already dropped 97% over 8 years before the first Measles vaccine was on the market).

The vaccine fanatics can never cite such a study. The vaccine fanatics will often cite misrepresented studies that in reality don’t include an unvaccinated control group. In any online discussion, or in public broadcasts, the vaccine fanatics will try to derail debate, change the subject, make excuses, ignore the issue, try to cite irrelevant studies that have nothing to do with the subject, start new threads, distract, insult, use emotional arguments, but they NEVER CITE SUCH A STUDY.

Vaccine-fanatics try to scare folks with silly stories about diseases prevented by vaccines and claim those diseases come back, or that anti-vaxxers will die, but there’s not even one peer reviewed scientific study showing that any vaccine even works! When vaccine-fanatics repeat claims like “Your kids will die from Smallpox” etc…. they’re displaying their ignorance. The Smallpox vaccine had the wrong virus and didn’t work at all, instead starting most of the epidemics. The Flu vaccines start influenza epidemics every year. It’s all a scam. The arguments to defend the vaccines are illogical bullshit, so vaccine-fanatics rely on emotional arguments, or try to push “Scarrrrrrry stories” of diseases – yet can’t show any peer reviewed studies of unvaccinated versus vaccinated in which the vaccines protected any people at all. They just parrot the lies of the media and medical industry.

On the other hand, it’s depressingly easy to find peer reviewed scientific studies and other evidence showing that vaccines have no health benefits and only result in harmful effects that vary in degree from minimal to seriously dangerous.

Increase the number of vaccinations the death rate for infants goes up!

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0960327112440111

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0960327111407644

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.4137/VRT.S12248

http://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476%2807%2900185-0/abstract

The Flu vaccine increases the risk of you getting the Flu and damages the immune system response.

http://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES2015.20.4.21022

Flu vaccines start epidemics of influenza

6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.”

https://www.pnas.org/content/115/5/1081

Flu vaccine results in 5.5 Times more respiratory infections

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/12/1778/455098

The vaccinated are spreading epidemics

https://web.archive.org/web/20150305094138/http://www.cnbc.com/id/102473744

Flu shots spread the Flu, turning the vaccinated into carriers who infect other people

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/01/17/1716561115

The inactivated Flu vaccine is still live and active

The Measles vaccine increases the chance of you getting the Measles

Children of mothers vaccinated against measles and, possibly, rubella have lower concentrations of maternal antibodies and lose protection by maternal antibodies at an earlier age than children of mothers in communities that oppose vaccination. This increases the risk of disease transmission in highly vaccinated populations.”

https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/208/1/10/796786

Repeatedly, the Measles vaccines do not protect anyone.

An outbreak of measles occurred in a high school with a documented vaccination level of 98 per cent.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1646939/

Vaccination coverage for the population was 99%. Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak. ”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1884314

The epidemiology of measles in Cape Town has thus changed as evinced in this epidemic, with an increase in the number of cases occurring in older, previously vaccinated children.

http://www.biomedsearch.com/nih/1992-measles-epidemic-in-Cape/7740350.html

There have been eruptions of measles in the USA in populations that were 100 percent vaccinated.

The affected high school had 276 students and was in the same building as a junior high school with 135 students. A review of health records in the high school showed that all 411 students had documentation of measles vaccination on or after the first birthday, in accordance with Illinois law.”

Measles Outbreak among Vaccinated High School Students – Illinois. MMWR. June 22, 1984 / 33(24);349-51 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00000359.htm

How many people were killed by the Measles vaccine in the USA? Here are official figures;

Additionally, the Measles vaccine results in *thousands harmed seriously in the USA:*

Of course some of the vaccine-addicts will try to claim “But how do you explain the eradication of common diseases such as Measles then?”


What did someone invent a time-machine, go back and cure people who had Measles BEFORE the vaccines were on the market? Are you that stupid??? Really?
In the 1st world nations, if we are to believe the bullshit that vaccine-fanatics accept, we’d have believe in time-travelling vaccines that cure diseases BEFORE THE VACCINES WERE EVEN USED!

In the USA, in 1900 there were 13.3 measles deaths per 100,000 population. By 1955, the death rate was 0.03 deaths per 100,000, a decline of 97.7%, 8 years before the 1st measles shot. The drop in measles cases actually began before the vaccine was licensed. I doubt very much that merely licensing a product would result in such a change.

“Measles mortality fell prior to the introduction of vaccines or antibiotics.”

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274901617_Age-specific_measles_mortality_during_the_late_19th-early_20th_centuries

Such common diseases were largely avoided by better nutrition, cleanliness, access to clean water, etc… in most 1st world nations, unlike the situation of a century ago but maybe I’m just imagining that the streets are a lot cleaner and don’t have sewerage everywhere. Washing hands with clean water and soap would seem an influential improvement over trying to wash hands without soap in dirty water that came from a horribly polluted river with no filtration anywhere at all in the network of plumbing and water supplies. Eating a decent meal instead of being half-starved would seem to be a big help too. Perhaps not being forced to work long hours from childhood might have helped. Maybe just being able to wash clothes in clean hot water could have assisted a bit.

The down trend began long BEFORE the mass vaccinations started so asserting that vaccines were responsible for this is just another absurd, unscientific lie spread by the corrupt government agencies and medical industry.

A drop in death rate means the vaccine did nothing, and as already shown with evidence, the vaccine has reduced immunity to the disease.

Natural chickenpox gives long-term immunity, the vaccine doesn’t but instead endangers the population

Prior to the universal varicella vaccination program, 95% of adults experienced natural chickenpox (usually as school aged children)—these cases were usually benign and resulted in long term immunity. This high percentage of individuals having long term immunity has been compromised by mass vaccination of children which provides at best 70 to 90% immunity that is temporary and of unknown duration—shifting chickenpox to a more vulnerable adult population where chickenpox carries 20 times more risk of death and 15 times more risk of hospitalization compared to children. Add to this the adverse effects of both the chickenpox and shingles vaccines as well as the potential for increased risk of shingles for an estimated 30 to 50 years among adults. The Universal Varicella (Chickenpox) Vaccination Program now requires booster vaccines; however, these are less effective than the natural immunity that existed in communities prior to licensure of the varicella vaccine.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22659447

Vaccinations increase the risk of Diabetes

Exposure to HiB immunization is associated with an increased risk of IDDM (insulin dependent diabetes mellitus)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12482192

Development of fulminant Type 1 diabetes with thrombocytopenia after influenza vaccination: a case report.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21781156

Vaccinations may induce diabetes-related autoantibodies in one-year-old children.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14679101

Vaccines and the risk of insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM): potential mechanism of action.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11735306

Autoimmune reactions are common enough to become a well-known problem.

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0961203311429318?journalCode=lupa

Vaccinations to pregnant women result in more miscarriages

the ascertainment-corrected reports yield an estimated rate of 590 fetal-loss reports per 1 million pregnant women vaccinated (or 1 per 1695).”

The VAERS rates of 6.8 and 12.6 fetal-loss reports per million women vaccinated for those single-vaccine seasons may provide health care professionals with a sense that influenza vaccines administered during pregnancy are relatively safe, when, in reality, these rates merely reflect the low level of case ascertainment associated with VAERS and thus, grossly underestimate the true rates encountered in the US population.”

(Flu vaccine shots given to pregnant women result in an increase in miscarriages, injecting 2 or more Flu shots results in a synergistic massive increase in miscarriages which is hidden by the inefficiency of VAERS in the USA)

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0960327112455067

Vaccinated kids are sicker than the unvaccinated kids

http://www.oatext.com/Pilot-comparative-study-on-the-health-of-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-6-to-12-year-old-U-S-children.php

Vaccinated children were significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with the following: allergic rhinitis (10.4% vs. 0.4%, p <0.001; OR 30.1, 95% CI: 4.1, 219.3), other allergies (22.2% vs. 6.9%, p <0.001; OR 3.9, 95% CI: 2.3, 6.6), eczema/atopic dermatitis (9.5% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.035; OR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.4, 6.1), a learning disability (5.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.003; OR 5.2, 95% CI: 1.6, 17.4), ADHD (4.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.013; OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2, 14.5), ASD [Autism Spectrum Disorder] (4.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.013; OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2, 14.5), any neurodevelopmental disorder (i.e., learning disability, ADHD or ASD) (10.5% vs. 3.1%, p <0.001; OR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.7, 7.9) and any chronic illness (44.0% vs. 25.0%, p <0.001; OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.7, 3.3).”

http://www.academia.edu/33687571/Mawson_Study_Health_Outcomes5_8_2017

DTP vaccination resulted 5x higher mortality than being unvaccinated.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360569/

Aseptic meningitis after vaccination against measles and mumps

This retrospective study (1979 to 1986) investigated the possible etiologic relationship between vaccination and aseptic meningitis in 115 hospitalized children who became ill within 30 days of vaccination with the Leningrad 3 strain of mumps virus and the Edmonston-Zagreb strain of measles virus.” The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1989 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/2726323/

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the incidence and the characteristics of spontaneously reported aseptic meningitis (AM) in France following mumps vaccination with monovalent or multivalent vaccines containing the Urabe strain. Fifty-four cases of AM were reported to the regional drug surveillance centres or to the manufacturer from the time each vaccine was launched up until June 1992. Twenty cases were associated with the time off administration of a monovalent mumps vaccine and 34 with a trivalent measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR). A mumps virus was isolated in four cases in the cerebrospinal fluid and an Urabe-like strain was characterised twice by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A probable mumps origin was assumed in 17 other cases where the patients presented with other clinical or biological signs of mumps infection. The clinical outcome of AM was always favourable. The global incidence of mumps vaccine-associated AM was 0.82/100,000 doses, which is significantly lower than the incidence in the unvaccinated population. Even considering that the actual incidence of AM is much higher when assessed by active surveillance studies, the risk/benefit ratio of mumps vaccine remains in favour of vaccination. The incidence of mumps vaccines containing Jeryl Lynn (ROR Vax et Imu ORR) associated with AM needs to be evaluated. PMID: 9164005, UI: 97306738. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=9164005&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b

Black S, et al.     Risk of hospitalization because of aseptic meningitis after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in one- to two-year-old children: an analysis of the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) Project. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 May;16(5):500-3. 
PMID: 9154545; UI: 97299143.


Basson E, Di Maio M, Stamm D, Cagnin S, Berger C, Floret D.  Arch Pediatr 1996 Apr;3(4):342-4 [Haemophilus influenzae meningitis following vaccination. Consequence or coincidence]?[Article in French] Unite de reanimation pediatrique, hopital Edouard-Herriot, Lyon, France.

Forsey T, et al.    Mumps vaccines and meningitis. Lancet. 1992 Oct 17;340(8825):980. No abstract available.PMID: 1357388; UI: 93023309.

Fujinaga T, et al. (1991) A prefecture-wide survey of mumps meningitis associated with measles, mumps and rubella vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991 Mar;10(3):204-9. PMID: 2041667; UI: 91252105.

A survey of untoward reactions, especially central nervous system reactions, after the administration of a newly introduced measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine in Gunma Prefecture, Japan, was initiated soon after 4 patients were hospitalized for aseptic meningitis. Thirty-five, 6 and 2 children developed meningitis, convulsive disorders and parotitis, respectively, within 2 months after MMR vaccination during the 8-month period extending from April to November, 1989. The time lag between MMR vaccination and meningitis ranged from 14 to 28 days in the 35 cases of meningitis. Mumps virus, isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid in 13 patients with aseptic meningitis, was characterized by determination of the nucleotide sequences of the P gene as mumps vaccine strain. The incidence of aseptic meningitis with positive mumps vaccine virus was estimated to be 0.11% (0.3% as a whole) during the 8 months from April to November and increased to 0.3% (0.7% as a whole) in September and October. We conclude that the incidence of aseptic meningitis after MMR vaccination seems to be higher than that reported previously.

Pregnant women who are vaccinated during pregnancy suffer more miscarriages, their children die more often. The CDC lies about the risks.

The Polio was eradicated by Polio vaccine lie

Dr Jonas Salk stated that the Polio vaccine used in the USA was the cause of the Polio epidemics in the USA from 1961 onward;

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=_xuz1cXDLX0

The 1st polio vaccine received FDA approval and licensing after only 2 hours of review – the fastest approved drug in the FDA’s history. The vaccine was manufactured by Cutter Laboratories, within days of vaccination, 40,000 children were left with polio, 200 with severe paralysis and ten deaths. The CDC doesn’t even mention this fact.

The Polio vaccines have a nasty history of horror

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23807364

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17130313

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12629643

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21685412

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC533926/

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/800879

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19880568

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22591873

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111741

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1554844

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19880568

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29563955

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847660

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/800879

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3071664/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC110068/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24514081

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/internalmedicine1992/42/2/42_2_191/_article

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(14)61251-4/fulltext

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10210810

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889594/

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/302316

More polio cases now caused by vaccine than by wild virus

Archive: http://archive.is/BM6kQ

Current Polio epidemic in India is due to the Polio vaccine being used;

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22591873

Polio used to be rare until they introduced vaccines for it, the vaccines now spread Polio to places that rarely had Polio before

https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/199/3/391/823479

Polio vaccine is causing it to become more virulent.

https://jvi.asm.org/content/76/13/6791.short

The CDC admitted that vaccines were spreading polio and making it more virulent. Their response was lets declare victory and move on.

https://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2398/rr/578260

https://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2398/rr/578260

Polio vaccine-derived epidemics in México;

https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/210/suppl_1/S315/2194386

The current Polio epidemic in the Philippines is also due to the Polio vaccine being used – admitted by the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

https://www.who.int/csr/don/24-october-2019-polio-the-philippines/en/

The Polio epidemic in Ghana is again due to the Polio vaccine being used – admitted by the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

https://www.who.int/csr/don/06-september-2019-polio-ghana/en/

Also in Myanmar, again, the VACCINE STARTED THE POLIO EPIDEMIC

https://www.who.int/csr/don/22-august-2019-polio-myanmar/en/

Have fun going through the list, all of the countries where THE VACCINE STARTED THE POLIO EPIDEMIC

The so-called “Smallpox vaccine” didn’t have the correct virus at all. According to the narrative, the exact virus is required as the immune system can’t learn to defend against something it’s never been exposed to. The wrong virus can not, and never could, provide a ‘sample’ for the immune system to be prepared for combating a different virus.

A genetic study discovered in 2012 that the so-called “Smallpox vaccine” contained horse pox – the wrong virus; https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/10/why-word-vaccine-probably-all-wrong

I quote: “A genomic analysis of a sample of the smallpox vaccine from 1902 provides evidence that the vaccine used to eradicate smallpox disease—which is caused by the variola virus—was made of  horsepox, a genetically similar but different virus entirely.”

The vaccine was responsible for nearly all of the epidemics (just like what’s happening now with the Polio vaccine-derived epidemics in 3rd world nations.


Every time there was a mass vaccination with the so-called  “smallpox vaccine”, it was followed by a mass epidemic and lots of people dying.

England decided to legislate compulsory vaccination in 1854, which in 1859 led to a major smallpox epidemic in which 14,000 people died. In subsequent years, more than 100,000 lives were claimed by smallpox, despite widespread vaccination as mandated by the English government.

1831: There was a smallpox outbreak in Wurtemberg, Germany, wherein 995 vaccinated people developed the disease.

1831: 2,000 people in Marseilles, France, who had received the smallpox vaccination, developed smallpox.

1854: England legislates for compulsory vaccination; widely opposed by eminent doctors of the day. The doctors already knew!

1857-59: Vaccination in England is now enforced, with fines for non-compliance, much to the disgust of rational medical men around the country who vigorously oppose it. Thus begins the smallpox epidemic of England, which lasts until 1859, killing over 14,000 people.

1854-63: Smallpox claimed over 33,000 lives by this point, following the introduction of a compulsory vaccination program.

1863-65: England’s second major epidemic strikes, claiming a further 20,059 lives.

1870-72: England’s third major epidemic claims 44,840 lives, the worst of the three, which occurred following compulsory vaccination.

1907: Compulsory vaccination laws were repealed. Their failure was too obvious to disguise or “spin” with the PR methods available at the time.

1910-33: During this period, in England and Wales combined, only 109 kids under the age of 5 years died of smallpox; 270 died from the vaccination. It is estimated there were around 40 million people in the UK in 1910.

http://u2.lege.net/whale.to/a/smallpox_stats_h.htm

http://u2.lege.net/whale.to/vaccine/quotes10.html

Philippines
“We were fortunate enough to address their own medical (and) health officials where we reminded them of the incidence of smallpox in formerly “immunized” Filipinos. We invited them to consult their own medical records and asked them to correct us if our own facts and figures disagreed. No such correction has been forthcoming, and we can only conclude that between 1918-1919 there were 112,549 cases of smallpox notified, with 60,855 deaths. Systematic (mass) vaccination started in 1905, and since its introduction case mortality increased alarmingly. Their own records comment that “The mortality is hardly explainable.”—Dr Kalokerinos (Second Thoughts on Disease by Archie Kalokerinos M.D. & Dr Dettman)
“During 10 outbreaks of smallpox between 1947 and 1974 nearly 100 people became ill with smallpox—even though they had been vaccinated.”Dr Buchwald (The Decline of Tuberculosis despite “Protective” Vaccination by Dr. Gerhard Buchwald M.D. p134)

United Kingdom

“In the Second Report of the Commission, pp. 219—20, a witness declared that out of six persons who died of small-pox and were reported by the medical officer of the Union to have been unvaccinated, five were found to have been vaccinated, one being a child who bad been vaccinated by the very person who made the report, and another a man who had been twice revaccinated in the militia”—–ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE [Book 1898]

In the epidemic of 1871-72, there died 14,808 persons of Smallpox in London, of whom 11,174 were Vaccinated. [1884] SIR LYON PLAYFAIR taken to Pieces and Disposed of: LIKEWISE SIR CHARLES W. DILKE, BART by William White

The figures of the Registrar-General, showing that in the twenty-seven years ending with 1911, 2,505 admittedly vaccinated persons died of small­pox, prove that vaccination does not protect. [1921] Vaccination and the State By Arnold Lupton MP.

“That vaccination is capable of extirpating the disease or of controlling epidemic waves is,” says Crookshank, ” absolutely negatived by the epidemic in 1825, and the epidemics which followed in quick succession in 1838, in 1840, 1841, 1844-5, 1848, 1851-2. Vaccination was made compulsory in 1853, but epidemics followed in 1854, 1855, and 1856, culminating in the terrible epidemic in 1871-72 with more than 42,000 deaths. Epidemics followed in 1877 and 1881.” (Inaugural Address to Medical Society of King’s College, October 26th, 1894.) [1921] Vaccination and the State By Arnold Lupton MP.

“Dr. Munk stated before the Hospital Commission, that the percentage of vaccinated patients in the London small-pox hospital had increased from 40 per cent. in 1838 to 94.6 per cent. in 1879 (3rd Report of Royal Comm., Q. 9090). This evidence was given in 1882; but Mr, Wheeler stated that according to the Reports of the Highgate hospital, the vaccinated patients had long been over 90 per cent of the whole, and are now often even 94 or 95per cent.”—–ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE [Book 1898]

” When England was most vaccinated, it not only had the greatest amount of smallpox, but most of its smallpox cases in those days occurred amongst the vaccinated.
The statistics of the Highgate Smallpox Hospital show that in 1871, 91.5 per cent. of their cases had been vaccinated, and in 1881, out of a total of 491 cases, 470, or nearly 96 per cent., had been vaccinated. The Lancet for 23 February 1884, gives the facts about an outbreak in Sunderland, where there were just 100 cases, and 96 of them had been vaccinated. On 27 August 1881, that journal published an account of an outbreak at Bromley, where 43 cases occurred, every one of them vaccinated.
Mr. Alexander Wheeler submitted figures to the Royal Commission on Vaccination (p. 204 of the Commission’s Third Report) which show that from 1870-86 the Metropolitan Asylums Board treated 53,579 smallpox cases, of which 41,061 were admittedly vaccinated, and 2,858 were put in the class they called doubtfully vaccinated.
Sheffield, an insanitary town, had a bad smallpox epidemic in 1887-88. Of 7,066 cases classed as vaccinated or unvaccinated, 5,891 or 83.4 per cent were put in the vaccinated class. Of 647 cases at Warrington, in 1892-93, 601, or 89.2 per cent, had been vaccinated; of 2,945 cases at Birmingham in 1892-93, 2,616, or 88.8 per cent, had been vaccinated; and of 828 cases at Willenhall in 1894, 739, or 89.3 per cent, had been vaccinated.
The last big outbreak of genuine smallpox was in London in 1901-2, when, out of almost 10,000 cases, some 7,000 had been vaccinated.”—- Lilly Loat

Even the case fatality-rate of the vaccinated patients in the London epidemic, as given in the special report, was 14.21 per cent. Compare this with the case fatality-rate of the unvaccinated patients at Leicester, in 1902-04 (given by Dr. Millard at page 21 of his report for 1904), of only 4.87 per cent, for the whole epidemic ; also with the unvaccinated case fatality-rate for the 1904 portion of the epidemic, of only 1.6 per cent. London has not much to boast of, when its vaccinated case fatality-rate was, therefore, nearly three times as great as (or about 300 per cent, above) Leicester’s unvaccinated case fatality-rate for the whole epidemic, and about nine times higher than (or nearly 900 per cent, above) Leicester’s unvaccinated case fatality-rate for 1904. CH 52 LEICESTER: SANITATION versus VACCINATION BY J.T. BIGGS J.P.

That Leicester (which was formerly classed by the Registrar-General amongst the most unhealthy towns of the country) had an average annual death-rate in 1868-72 of 26.82 per 1,000 total population, when the percentage of vaccinations was 91.7 to the total births; and that subsequently, when vaccinations had fallen to 2.1 per cent, to the total births, the average annual death-rate from all causes for 1893-97 had fallen to only 17.31 per 1,000 living, and has since gone down to 12.30.
The lesson of this table (49) is that when we pinned our faith to the prophylactic and saving virtues of vaccination—from 1868 to 1872—no fewer than an annual average of 239 out of every 1,000 infants born died within twelve months of their birth. Now, having seen the error of our ways, and discarded the nostrum, instead of 239 deaths, there is only an annual average of 128 deaths per 1,000 births, or a decrease of 111 per thousand, being a saving of 46 per cent. These figures represent an annual saving of over 600 infant lives each year in Leicester.
..The saving of children’s lives under five years of age is on the same lines of progress. Whereas in the high vaccination period of 1866-72 there were 107 deaths per thousand living at that age, now there are only 34 per thousand, being a decrease of 73 per thousand, or a saving of 68 per cent. This represents a saving of over 2,200 lives each year of children living under five. LEICESTER: SANITATION versus VACCINATION BY J.T. BIGGS J.P.

It must be borne in mind that the epidemic of 1871-73 found a fully vaccinated population in Leicester, both infantile and adult, whilst those of 1892-94 and 1902-04 occurred in populations essentially unvaccinated. A yet more striking feature is that in 1892-94 there were, approximately, 50,000 unvaccinated children in the town ; and in 1902-04 there would not be fewer than 70,000 unvaccinated children in Leicester, nearly all of whom passed through these epidemics entirely unscathed. Only very few children, indeed, were attacked.
Who, then, can blame Leicester people for giving up the nostrum of vaccination? With such an object-lesson before their very eyes, it would indeed have been strange had they done otherwise! Yet the medical journals have continued to denounce Leicester for taking up an attitude against vaccination, which not only entirely accords with reason and common sense, but is justified to the full by its own unimpeachable experience. LEICESTER: SANITATION versus VACCINATION BY J.T. BIGGS J.P.

Now, comparing the small-pox epidemic of 1868-72 in Leicester, when the “protection” was 18 per cent, on the professional five years basis, with the epidemics of 1892-94 and 1902-04, when the “protection” was less than one per cent., what do we find? That, reckoning the difference in population, in the first of those epidemics, with eighteen times the amount of vaccinal “protection,” Leicester had nearly thirty times as much fatal small-pox as in the second and third epidemics. So much for the highly vaunted “protection” theory, worked out on a scientific period basis! LEICESTER: SANITATION versus VACCINATION BY J.T. BIGGS J.P.

“Now, in the epidemic of 1871, 91.5 per cent. of the cases admitted to the Highgate Hospital were vaccinated, and at the same place in 1881, of 491 cases only twenty-one were not vaccinated, and this at a time when certainly not more than 90 per cent. of Londoners were “protected;” and, indeed, in an outbreak at Bromley, comprising forty-three cases, every one of the victims had been vaccinated and three re-vaccinated, (Lancet, April 27,1881.) so that it would seem, as regards the relative incidence of small-pox, vaccination has very little effect. If I wished to improve the occasion, after Sir Lyon Playfair’s example, I might quote Dr. Browning, who gives particulars of 469 cases of post-vaccinal small-pox, of whom ninety-nine died, or 21.108 per cent. of whom he says, “many of these sufferers showed good vaccine marks of the kind that would be deemed worthy of an extra grant from the Government Inspector, and yet they took small-pox.”William J. Collins, M.D., B.S., B.Sc. 1883

Regarding the World Health Organization’s claims of victory over smallpox;

Regarding the World Health Organization’s claims of victory over smallpox;

Smallpox was on the way out, indeed epidemics disappeared decades before the WHO decided to conduct the final “eradication” campaign. It is also well-documented that the largest epidemics occurred in the most highly vaccinated populations, while whose who were unvaccinated, did not have the same epidemics.” – Dr. Viera Scheibner (micropaleontologist)

The forced quarantines finally eradicated the Smallpox virus from all human populations, the so-called “Smallpox vaccine” did fuck-all except start new epidemics.

No randomized control studies on the effectiveness of the tetanus vaccine have ever been completed. People who have been vaccinated against tetanus have gotten tetanus anyway. The vaccine doesn’t work! https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1970.tb50168.x?sid=nlm%3Apubmed&amp;

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1970.tb50168.x?sid=nlm%3Apubmed

https://www.ajemjournal.com/article/S0735-6757%2813%2900696-7/fulltext https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9071251 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/403133 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1565228 https://www.jem-journal.com/article/S0736-4679%2804%2900183-0/fulltext

So where is a peer reviewed scientific study with properly randomized, blind-tested, control groups of vaccinated versus unvaccinated (AS REAL SCIENCE REQUIRES!) to show that any vaccine even works? I can’t find one. I’ve asked vaccine-fanatics to cite such a study, they NEVER do. They can’t cite one either. Can you? Can anyone? I don’t believe such a study exists. I’ve been asking for studies for well over ten years!

Mothers who have been vaccinated don’t pass resistance to the disease onto their children, clear evidence that the vaccine does not protect anyone! Vaccine antibodies are useless crap! The vaccines don’t protect anybody except corporate profits.

And yet I’m called “anti-science” when I cite peer reviewed scientific studies that show all of the problems with vaccinations, that the product does not appear to work at all.

As more people become aware of this, see the damage that vaccines do, more people refuse vaccines. So they should. Vaccines don’t work, they are a scam.

GOT TO KEEP LOVING THOSE VACCINES WHICH ARE KILLING PEOPLE, RIGHT?

Published by onlytheghosts

I live in Japan in the Kansai region but in the countryside, and I'm a person of many hats. I try not to limit myself to whatever others may categorise as my creative and intellectual niche. Life isn't about discovering who you are, it's about finding what you can become...

4 thoughts on “A Great Big Load Of Nothing

  1. > “Every time there was a mass vaccination with the so-called “smallpox vaccine”, it
    > was followed by a mass epidemic and lots of people dying.”

    Could you clarify or expand on this please, or perhaps supply a correction? Maybe I missed something, but I’m left wondering how the wrong vaccine (horsepox, or cowpox as it’s known down here) could have caused a “mass epidemic” of smallpox “every time” it was used. After all, if the milkmaids didn’t get smallpox then how did the “wrong virus” mutate selectively when administered artificially?

    Like

    1. Jenner’s paper claiming that “Milk maids getting cowpox didn’t get smallpox” never passed peer review. The claim was never scientifically supported by any study. The “smallpox” epidemics that followed mass vaccinations were likely not actual “smallpox virus” but had similar symptoms so were diagnosed as “smallpox” by the doctors at the time, since they had no method for genetic analysis.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website with WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this: